When it comes to modern master data and standardisation, everyone is talking about the 'Material Dictionary'. But what exactly does this term mean, and what is the overarching goal of the joint development by ECLASS and morphe*?
Answer: As part of ECLASS, the Material Dictionary is a logical evolution of existing master data approaches, particularly in response to regulatory requirements such as the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). This regulation requires a more in-depth digitization of product information. While the focus has often been on products, the perspective is shifting toward components—in line with the principle that "a component is a product."
This is precisely where the Material Dictionary comes in. It provides a consistent approach for describing materials and components across all material classes and industries. It enables a standardized, end-to-end database that integrates seamlessly into existing ECLASS structures. For companies and software providers already working with ECLASS, this means low barriers to entry combined with significantly expanded information content in the context of the product.
Who will the Material Dictionary change the day-to-day work of? What industries and roles within companies, such as purchasing, development, and data management, make up the primary target audience? What does a typical use case look like?
Answer: The Material Dictionary is intended for companies in industries such as mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, automotive, and construction that develop, manufacture, or procure complex products. Functions such as development, procurement, sustainability management, and master data management benefit the most within these companies.
One key use case is the Full Material Declaration (FMD), which provides complete transparency regarding all materials used in a product. In practice, achieving this level of transparency is often not feasible today. Reasons for this include inconsistent and evolving material lists, a lack of structured information at the component level, and insufficient data provided by suppliers.
The Material Dictionary addresses these issues by providing a standardized language and structure that can be used throughout the entire supply chain. For the first time, it becomes possible to consistently capture, exchange, and process complete material information.
Within companies, master data projects are often viewed as dry and time-consuming. So why focus on the Material Dictionary from day one? What are the system's measurable benefits and strategic advantages for users?
Answer: Although master data projects require an initial investment of time and effort, the investment in ECLASS, combined with the Material Dictionary, pays off quickly. One of the biggest advantages is the more efficient use of resources. Data does not need to be collected or updated multiple times, and it is available in a consistent, structured format.
Furthermore, the dictionary opens up new strategic opportunities, particularly in the context of R-strategies, such as repair, refurbish, or recycle. Only those with a precise understanding of their materials and components can reuse products (or parts and materials) specifically or design them to be more sustainable.
Lastly, the standardized database enables transparent processes that can be automated much more effectively. This reduces errors, speeds up workflows, and creates a robust foundation for data-driven decisions.
Behind the Scenes: Where does the project stand at this point? What are the most significant milestones you’ve achieved so far, and what technological or conceptual challenges are you facing in the current development phase?
Answer: A key milestone of the project was the deliberate decision to remain within the existing ECLASS data model. This allows us to continue using and expanding existing structures rather than building entirely new systems.
Specifically, the Material Dictionary remains based on ECLASS's established elements: the class structure, properties, and associated values. This continuity significantly facilitates integration and builds trust among users.
The current challenges primarily lie in mapping the necessary level of detail at the component and material levels without unnecessarily increasing complexity for users. At the same time, achieving broad acceptance throughout the supply chain is essential, as the benefits depend largely on the participation of all stakeholders.
From a practical standpoint, this is probably the most important question: When can we expect the official launch? Are you planning a pilot or beta phase with selected partners beforehand? If so, how can interested companies best prepare for the launch?
Answer: A specific go-live date currently depends on various development and coordination processes. However, the plan is to conduct pilot or beta phases with select partners before a broad rollout. These phases are intended to test the model under real-world conditions and optimize it further.
Companies wishing to prepare early should first analyze their existing master data structures and assess their compatibility with ECLASS. Additionally, they should review their internal processes regarding material transparency and supplier data, as well as identify initial pilot applications.
To wrap up, let’s look ahead: The Material Dictionary will continue to evolve in response to market demands. If we meet again for an interview in five years—what role will the Dictionary play in the global supply chain and in the context of ongoing digitalization (keyword: Digital Product Passport)?
Answer: In five years, the Material Dictionary will have closed a significant gap in the digital description of products and their components. It will connect materials, components, and final products across all industries to fulfill the primary objectives of the ESPR.
The Material Dictionary will play a key role in the Digital Product Passport by providing the essential data foundation for transparency, traceability, and sustainability assessments. At the same time, the Dictionary's usability will have improved, allowing companies to capture and efficiently use information.
Consequently, the Material Dictionary is evolving into a fundamental building block of modern, digitally connected supply chains.
